Monday, February 07, 2011

Statistics - St.Joseph

In 2009 250 children in MI were victims of methamphetamine related abuse, 26 of these were in St.Joseph county, second in the state only to kalamazoo county.

There were 9,731 children under three years of age in MI alone that were the victims of abuse or neglect….and another 22,594 that were over 3 years of age. It shocked and sickened me to find out that 64 of the perpetrators were FOSTER parents…come on people.

20% of the children in care in Michigan are under age 3, this is NOT acceptable Michigan, wake up and smell the abuse, it is a national epidemic but we are definitely one of the states leading the disgraceful list. 

MI DHS Hires 500 MI college graduates


Feb. 4, 2011

Michigan Department of Human Services to hire more than 500 Michigan college graduates to work in child welfare services

The Michigan Department of Human Services today announced it is hiring more than 500 highly qualified Michigan graduates to work in children's protective, foster care, adoption, juvenile and home licensing services to continue to improve the child welfare system, Director Maura D. Corrigan said.

"This is encouraging news because these people will be on the front lines, working with Michigan children and families to ensure they have the services and supports they need," Corrigan said. "This move is an important step that helps our department fulfill its commitment to protect Michigan's most vulnerable children."

UPDATE ON LOCAL FOSTER CARE RECRUITMENT- St.Joseph County

UPDATE ON LOCAL FOSTER CARE RECRUITMENT
August Session of the Board of County Commissioners for St.Joseph County

 Probate Judge Thomas Shumaker stated that  on June 21, 2010 the Board approved $20,000 to improve
foster care recruitment.  There were no specifics at that time and the group that has been meeting focused their
energies on 5 areas.  He is recommending that funds be allocated to these 5 areas as follows:

  1 - Recruitment materials and services - $2,500
  2 - Licensing assistance - $1,000
  3 - Support group - $6,000
  4 - Respite - $1,000
  5 - Public relations - $500

 The group decided to begin focusing their recruitment in the faith based community.
 Pam Smith, a foster/adoptive parent gave a presentation with a power point regarding her experience in
foster parenting.  The presentation was directed to the faith based community.
 Judge Shumaker stated that while their focus, at first, is to the faith based community, they would like to
eventually make presentations to service clubs and organizations. 

 They are trying to recruit foster parents, but they also would like to solicit people that could be supportive
to families that have foster kids like providing meals or babysitting the kids so that the parents could have some
time to themselves.
  
 Mrs. Smith stated during her presentation that we all need to “aspire to inspire before you expire.”  She said
that we can save these kids one at a time.

 Judge Shumaker stated that they want to move slowly through this process and will stick with the faith
based community first and work out any bumps that may come along.  They do not want to do too much too soon. 
He said that Bethany Christian Services is also recruiting foster parents and they are a part of their focus group as
is DHS, CA/N Council and others.

 It was moved by Commissioner Dobberteen and supported by Commissioner Shaffer that the $11,000 be
allocated to the foster care recruitment program as requested by Judge Shumaker.
 Commissioner Dobberteen stated that this program is much better than continuing to write $80,000 checks
to the Department of Human Services.  He is glad that the community is stepping up.
 Chairman Dunlap is impressed with Judge Shumaker’s efforts to put this together.  The group has some
concrete ideas to achieve a goal.

 Commissioner Shaffer commended Judge Shumaker and the focus group.
 Judge Shumaker stated that he believes that the group needs judicial leadership but there is a fine line being
a Judge at the same time.  Since April 15th of this year many kids have been released from the system.
 Chairman Dunlap is glad that everyone is working in one direction now.

 Judge Shumaker further stated that the settlement of a few years  ago was wrong costing the County so
much money.


Hitting the MARC

Hitting the MARC

A first ever national research study was performed to establish minimum adequate rates for children; the goal was to perform calculations of the real expenses for caring for children in foster care. So how does Michigan rate? Poorly I’m afraid, though not the worst by far.

In 2005 there were over 20,000 children in foster care, the average number of different placements that children in foster care go through was 3 and 16% of children were placed in facilities instead of homes (gasp) and the length of stay in foster care was 23.8 months.

Michigan’s current foster care rate for a child 2 and under is $433/month; the recommendation is $646 plus reimbursement for travel expenses and childcare. According to their calculations Michigan needs to increase its reimbursement rate by 49% to hit the MARC. The national data shows the cost of raising a child in the same age range in the Midwest is $750. The group in the worst shape is reimbursement for children 9-16 which needs to increase by 71%!

You can compare this to our nearby state of Indiana which reimburses foster families of the same age $760 compared to $433 is a big difference! The MARC study states that low rates can negatively impact the states ability to recruit and retain foster parents which sets off a chain reaction of negative events that has life long consequences for children in foster care. When an adequate pool of foster parents are unable to be maintained children are more likely to be placed in institutionalized facilities which are costly or shuttled from placement to placement, an unstable situation which harms the child and can decrease their chances of growing up in a permanent family. 

Michigan Monitor: State failing in fix of foster care system

I know a few foster parents right now and I am shocked and appalled at the length of time a child can continue on in care and not be given a permanent plan. I know a child right now who was picked up at birth by foster parents, she just had her first birthday recently and the judge gave additional time to a father who had missed the past 3 visits and failed the past 2 drug tests. The foster parents are the only family this child has ever known, she is well adjusted and happy. 


There is something to be said for keeping a child in their biological family, that is always the best bet but at what point do we look more at the best interest of the child than at the 'rights' of the parents. There is a law that rights should be terminated after being in care for the past 17 out of 22 months....this is ironically one of the most often violated laws. I have to go into this fostering experience knowing that I can only do so much and I need to focus on caring for the child and not fixing the system but this stuff drives me nuts. For now I have settled on educating myself and doing some reading and perhaps, by blogging, raising some awareness. 


Monitor: State failing in fix of foster care system


Catherine Jun / The Detroit News


Detroit  Michigan's child welfare system is still failing too many children, according to a report released Tuesday, and a federal judge overseeing the system's overhaul is placing hopes for a fix on Gov.-elect Rick Snyder. Nearly two years after the state agreed to fix its broken foster care system, the state is not meeting court-sanctioned deadlines for reform, the report said.
The 200-page progress report, authored by a court-appointed monitor, describes a bureaucracy with overburdened caseworkers, too few foster homes and more children left in foster care without the hope of adoption.

"Sustainable, positive change is hard, but it is possible," said Kevin Ryan, who was appointed by U.S. District Judge Nancy Edmunds to monitor the reform process. "And here in Michigan, it is essential."
The persistent deficiencies cited in the report initially prompted the child advocacy group that has been behind the reforms to announce plans to file a motion of contempt this week and seek a federal takeover of the Michigan Department of Human Services, the agency that oversees foster care and adoption.
But later Tuesday, the agency, New York-based Children's Rights, backed away from the plans after Edmunds said she received assurances from Snyder that his incoming administration will make fixing the Department of Human Services a top priority.

"I have every reason to believe Gov.-elect Snyder is extremely interested in this issue, in this case," Edmunds said.
A spokesman for Snyder said he plans to swiftly address problems with the foster care system.
"The governor-elect is very interested in resolving this issue as soon as possibleand it's something he is going to be discussing with his new director of Human Services, once that appointment is made," said Bill Nowling, spokesman for Snyder's transition team. "It's obviously something he's going to want to resolve right away.
"We're going to look at this seriously."

This is the latest update in a five-year overhaul of the state's foster care system. Children's Rights sued in July 2008 after a series of high-profile deaths in foster care. The state settled the suit and agreed to a five-year plan to dramatically change how it handled its caseloads.
But the latest report, the third since the settlement, shows the state is at least a year behind schedule, and is backsliding in some areas of improvement.

"For young people in foster care, a year can feel like a lifetime," said Sara Bartosz, senior staff attorney for Children's Rights.

And with 1,300 staffers expected to retire from the agency, caseloads for child protective service workers are predicted to worsen, the report said.
This is the final report before Snyder takes over as governor next month. DHS Director Ismael Ahmed is slated to be replaced in January, a department spokesman said.

Meeting planned for Jan.
Ryan submitted his report to Edmunds at a hearing Tuesday afternoon. The report covered the six-month period from Oct. 1, 2009, to March 31, 2010.
In addition to failures in reducing caseloads and recruiting enough foster homes, Ryan found data-keeping and mathematical errors in state records, including how the state counts the children in its care. The state delayed the recording of adoption finalizations in some cases by as much as 225 days.
"Child welfare managers and staff across Michigan, in both the private and public sector, are working very hard, but their best efforts are often undone by poor planning and a lack of adequate coordination," the report stated.
Following a meeting in Edmunds' chambers, attorneys agreed to meet again with DHS officials in late January — after Snyder takes office — to devise a plan to get reforms on track.
"We have every confidence that they see how urgent this is," Bartosz said. But she added the group hasn't ruled out seeking federal intervention later if the system doesn't improve.

State officials cite progress
Children's Rights has sued other child welfare systems in the last several decades, pushing for better protections for foster children and resorting to seeking a receiver when reforms lag.
In a case similar to Michigan's, a federal court in September found Washington, D.C.'s system in contempt of court-ordered reforms.

The federal judge ordered D.C. officials to allocate more money — as much as the District spent on legal fees over a year and a half fighting Children's Rights — on programs for youth aging out of foster care.
The city has been under a consent decree since 1993. Its child welfare system was under federal management from 1995 to 2000.

Michigan officials acknowledged the state had failed to meet deadlines for improvement. But there has been significant progress in some areas, they say.
More children have been adopted from foster care, are receiving better mental health services and have better outcomes overall, Ahmed, the department director, said in a statement.
Other accomplishments include reducing the number of children in foster care and expanding a program that provides in-home services and support to families with children who have serious emotional problems.
"The safety of children is our No. 1 priority," said Edward Woods III, spokesman for DHS. "Don't say we don't have a sense of urgency. That's not true."
"There's always been a sense of urgency."
The previous report issued in March showed the state then, too, missed significant targets, like sufficiently reducing the number of children aging out of foster care and documenting adequate responses to allegations of abuse or neglect of foster children.
DHS then was put on a 30-day watch to get reforms on track.

Michigan Faces Foster Home Shortage

I can add a personal note here. I can say that we have had our 9 month old 'peanut' for close to two weeks and we have everything that you really need for a baby girl left over from Lillian. There are always those things that get used up, so far we have purchased: diapers, mylicon, teething gel, food/formula (before WIC kicked in), diapers, some hats and socks, bottles, bowls, and spoons. We have definitely spent more than we have received. Now to be fair, I would expect that the total spending will go down now that we have purchased some of those things but on the flip side the WIC food and formula is not going to last the whole month either.

For us personally we were prepared to 'loose' a bit of money each month to care for our child(ren) but for many who would like to be foster parents that is not financially an option. Now, to be fair, you *could* get away with spending less money but you would need to be very careful. I will post more on this later as I found another study that was done solely for comparing costs of care.

I know that our county is in a severe shortage of foster homes and I can't help but wonder if this is a large contributing factor.


Michigan faces foster home shortage
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 04.28.10 | 6:21 pm

Two years ago a lawsuit brought on behalf of the state’s foster children resulted in a federal court settlement that required the state to improve its foster care system.
But job loss and home foreclosure have threatened the stability of foster families across the state and, according to the Detroit Free Press, the supply of foster homes shrunk 9 percent between 2005 and 2009.

“We used to have foster parents coming from everywhere,” Jeanine Thornton, licensing and placement supervisor at the Children’s Center, a child welfare agency in Detroit told the Detroit News. “Right now, people are barely able to take care of their own children.”
Each year since 2005, more foster homes have closed than have opened. What have resulted are 7,442 siblings in foster care placed in separate foster homes, and 1,312 children in institutions, according to a recent report from a court-appointed monitor overseeing the state’s child welfare reform.
The decline in available foster homes is made more pressing by a new rule that reduces the number of children assigned to each home from four to three.
Another problem is that for some the compensation offered by the state doesn’t cover costs of taking care of children.
In Michigan, foster payment rates range from $14.24 to $17.59 a day to pay for a child’s expenses, depending on the child’s age. Families can request additional payments for children with special medical needs. About 14 states pay less than Michigan’s per-diem rate for a 9-year-old child, according to a 2008 study by the Hunter College School of Social Work.

Children's Rights - Michigan Child Care Task Force

I've been doing some reading and research into foster care and specifically foster care in Michigan. I think some of this is really good information and worth sharing. 


Children’s Rights, an advocacy organization, has filed a lawsuit against the State of Michigan/Department of Human Services regarding Michigan’s foster care system.

-The full lawsuit filing can be found at www.childrensrights.org

-There are roughly 19,000 children in the Michigan child welfare system. The lawsuit names children with case examples of child welfare system failures. Overall, the child welfare system is extremely under-funded both publicly and privately. Children’s Rights has sued many states. Some states, like Georgia, have chosen to fight the lawsuit and have spent millions over several years while others have chosen to negotiate and settle. Michigan began formal negotiations and a settlement process in September 2006. Michigan is using a mediator between the state and Children’s Rights. Michigan’s Department of Human Services has put together an advisory group, including private providers, to assist in the process. DHS will have private discussions with Children’s Rights, but will use the advisory group to reflect ideas before committing to Children’s Rights.

*Excerpts from the federal lawsuit filed by Children’s Rights Inc. in August 2006 against Michigan’s child welfare system.

From the Children’s Rights lawsuit: “As a result of serious systemic deficiencies that have been known to Defendants for many years, the Michigan child welfare system inflicts numerous harms on Plaintiff Children, including:

a. Maltreatment or neglect of foster children while in state custody.

Too often children brought into Michigan’s foster care custody because they have suffered abuse or neglect are subject to further maltreatment while in the custody of DHS. This maltreatment occurs because of Defendants’ failure to (i) appropriately screen and oversee foster homes; (ii) segregate sexually reactive children (often themselves victims of prior sexual abuse) or physically aggressive children from other foster children; and (iii) adequately monitor and support caregivers, including unlicensed caregivers, who provide homes for children in the foster care custody of DHS.

b. A lack of basic physical and mental health services for foster children. Michigan’s foster children are routinely denied the services necessary to address known psychological, behavioral and emotional issues due to the absence of a minimally adequate mental health system. Moreover, due to agency cost-cutting measures, children are frequently left in foster homes that are unable to meet their special needs and in which their mental health further deteriorates. Foster children are also routinely denied timely basic medical and dental examinations and services.

c. Excessive lengths of stay in state custody. Michigan’s foster children are unnecessarily spending large portions of their lives – and sometimes their entire childhoods – in foster care custody. Defendants fail to provide foster children with appropriate case management, case plans and the services, including adoption-related services, required to prevent children from growing up in state custody. Michigan’s foster children who cannot return home are routinely denied the opportunity to be adopted, and many are discharged from the foster care system at the state’s age of majority without the life skills necessary to live independently.

d. Frequent moves among multiple placements. Subjecting foster children, who have already undergone the trauma of being removed from an abusive or neglectful home, to repeated changes in their primary caregivers causes serious harm to their development and psychological health. Yet, data collected by DHS and reported to the federal government shows that over 62% of the children in DHS foster care custody during fiscal year 2002, the last year for which such data is available, had been in foster care for more than 12 months, and over 40% of these children had already experienced three or more different placements during their lengthy foster care episodes.

These continuing harms to Plaintiff Children are caused by a number of severe deficiencies in Michigan’s foster care system, including:

a. A severe shortage of foster homes. Defendants fail to maintain an adequate number and variety of foster homes and other appropriate placements for foster children. Foster children are placed wherever a bed or “slot” is available and not according to their individual needs. As a result, foster children are too often moved from one foster home to another because their needs are not being met, repeatedly suffering emotional harm.

b. High caseloads and turnover. Caseworkers responsible for overseeing the care and protection of children in Defendants’ foster care custody often have dangerously high caseloads that are frequently multiples of the national standard of 12-15 foster children per caseworker. High caseloads and an unsupportive environment for many caseworkers have led to soaring caseworker turnover rates of almost 40%. The DHS early retirement programs implemented in 1997 and again in 2002 caused significant numbers of experienced DHS caseworkers to retire, resulting in a largely inexperienced frontline and supervisory child welfare workforce.

c. Poor monitoring of child safety. Michigan’s foster homes are often inadequately screened for safety. The State Auditor’s 2005 “Performance Audit of the Children’s Foster Care Program” identified more than 320 homes that had never undergone a safety assessment as required by DHS policy. Additionally, high caseloads prevent caseworkers from devoting the time needed to adequately monitor the safety of foster children assigned to them. As of March 2006, DHS reported that more than 30% of foster children statewide were not receiving even the minimally required monthly contact from their caseworker.

d. Poor planning and services to move children out of foster care and into permanent homes. Defendants routinely fail to provide foster children with the appropriate case-planning and adoption-related services required to ensure that children do not languish in their care. As a result, there are more than 6300 children in the foster care custody of DHS who are legal orphans – or “permanent wards” – for whom parental rights have been terminated, but no adoptive home has been identified. More than 400 of these children age out of the child welfare system each year, ill-equipped for adult life.

e. Grossly inadequate payments to foster care providers. The payments that Defendants provide to those caring for foster children do not even approach the actual cost of care for a child. DHS pays foster parents as little as $433 per month to raise a two-year-old foster child, though the federal government estimates that the average monthly cost of raising a similarly aged child in the urban Midwest is $733, net of health care expenses. Though Defendants increasingly rely upon relatives, such as retired grandparents, to care for its foster children, Defendants provide inadequate, and often no, financial support to these caregivers who are themselves frequently of limited means.

f. Fiscal waste. Michigan regularly fails to collect available federal funds for foster children in state custody, foregoing many millions of dollars that could be used to provide desperately needed homes and services for children. The State Auditor reported in December 2005 that the State now may be exposed to over $99 million in reimbursements to the federal government due to the mismanagement of its federally-subsidized child welfare programs including Title IV-E foster care, adoption assistance, and the Chafee independent living program for teen youth. These failures to properly access and manage federal funding are particularly glaring given that Michigan is among the nation’s bottom 12 states in the ratio of state and local funds to federal funds directed to support its child welfare system.

This page printed from: http://www.bridges4kids.org/articles/2006/12-06/mcctf11-1-06.html

From the Minutes of the November 1, 2006 meeting of the Michigan Child Care Task Force: Report from Elizabeth Carey, Executive Director, Michigan Federation for Children and Families, on the current Children’s Rights lawsuit that has been filed against the State of Michigan/Department of Human Services regarding Michigan’s foster care system.